🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial move to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and families are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising number of nations are moving toward parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the PM arguing that phones and apps are "stealing our kids' youth". The policy is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban remains "an tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has urged the legislature to pass a law raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended parents to restrict their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory statement calling for a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it warns of the "compulsive" design of these services, the resolution does not create enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a good foundation," stated a leading European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Eye

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a possible ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "based on strong research".

Earlier, momentum built behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. One foundation set up by the family of a teenager who took her own life after being exposed to disturbing social media material argues that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are appropriate and fit for children," said a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, legislation is primarily occurring at the regional level due to national inaction.

• Utah mandates adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a law prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has approved a law capping minors to one hour of social media time per day, with extra time requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed laws demanding guardian approval for minors to open social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from various politicians to follow this example, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Outside of the West, other states are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, international organizations strike a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The body points out that the internet can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that bans should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in safety.

As this international discussion continues, the actions of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers globally are increasingly content to wait for platforms to self-regulate.